« All this talk about Freshman students...what about Transfers? | Main | It’s not all about prestige... »

May 30, 2006

SAT-Optional...Hmm...

I have been pondering this topic for a few days now, wondering how to approach it. I have a number of mixed feelings…questioning the pros and cons of taking the SAT.
The article that I read, “Momentum for Going SAT-Optional”, on www.insidehighered.com, brought a number of red flags and go-lights at the same time, for me.

What does the SAT prove, really? Your ‘potential of learning’, yes…but what if you are a horrible test taker? Then what are you supposed to do? Pray that the schools you are applying to look more at your GPA, class ranking and grades more so than the SAT scores…that’s what you should do.

SAT-Optional, in my opinion can go either way. This could be very beneficial for students who have test anxiety and this could also lead to students not getting in gear their senior year and slacking off…Some may say that taking the SAT is too much pressure. I say we all need pressure in life :)
At this point, students know they need to be successful academically and also do well on the SAT to be accepted into college. With making the SAT optional, what do high school students have to work towards? Do they really know the demands college, not to mention, what life holds?

I have read a number of comments on this topic, and the following in particular rings true for me, personally.

“The real issue for me where colleges have made ACT/SAT optional is that the ritual of signing up, scheduling, and taking the test is a marvelous wake-up call to thousands of students to take their remaining time in high school seriously. It reminds the whole family as well as the student that they are growing up, having to take responsibility, and that they will soon leave the nest. Take the time to prepare......I can’t think of any more important event in high school than taking the ACT/SAT to make students begin to ponder their future.” – David Mathieu, Vice President, Normandale Community College

The most important question is, what do YOU think??

The following is a website of over 700 institutions that do not require the SAT or ACT for admission.

http://www.fairtest.org/optinit.htm

Posted by AshleyHoffman at May 30, 2006 1:24 PM

Comments

I would like to add Ashley for those students that have learning disabilites or test anxiety, there are options for extended test time available. They should speak with their guidance counselors prior to scheduling their exams.
Also, SHU does prefer to have SAT or ACT scores for new freshmen. However, we do have a Write Option available. Students can contact the Admissions Office to determine if they are eligible for this option.

Comment by: Kim McCarty at May 30, 2006 3:38 PM

Ashley, don't forget to mention the importance of letters of reference.

If an application includes reference letters from employers, community leaders, and coaches, I'm certainly willing to use them to help me gauge an applicant's maturity and character, but if the application doesn't include a positive letter from someone who's familiar with the applicant's educational record, then the test scores become that much more important.

Comment by: Dennis G. Jerz at May 30, 2006 4:40 PM

Taking the SATs is like a right-of-passage, and can be a factor in two similar students for a competitive college. I personally don't think they should be optional. The ACTs are designed much differently than the SATs, and can help balance the scores. But I'm a person who likes to focus more on the character and potential a student has.

Downingtown has an award called the Whippet Pride Award, which is given to 25 of our 400+ seniors. These recipients are not chosen based on academic achievement, SAT scores, athletic ability, or even contributions to after school activities. Rather, it's given to those who have quietly done what is asked of them, and been excellent rolemodels based on their character, and nothing else. Each receipient must have been nominated by two teachers, and approved by every teacher and administrative officer. Getting nominated is an honor within itself, so imagine my surprise when I was a recipient! Not the Valedictorian, not the NHS chairpeople, but 25 of us who have found other ways to shine.

THAT'S the thing that matters to me. I don't care if I'm Valdedictorian or not--I'm ME. So many other things can be taught, but character is learned and difficult to change.

I loved Seton Hill because it took such a close look at my essay and letters of recommendation (like Professor Jerz mentioned). Grades and SAT scores have nothing to do with who I am.


Keep the SATs because they do count (besides, if I suffered through it, then my underclassmen friends should have to, too!), they do matter. But they should, in no way, be one of the major deciding factors.

Comment by: Becca Sands at June 1, 2006 10:00 AM

Becca...are you punning or is there a spelling gaffe in "right of passage'...normally the expression is "rite of passage"? In either case, SAT scores and grades, indeed, have something to do with who a student is, but , as you suggest, they have less significance than letters of recommendation or personal essays might. A written passage, even when frought with deception or florid phrasing, ends up revealing the writer's character.

Comment by: ct wansor at June 6, 2006 6:47 AM

The list of extracurriculars can also show who a student is and what is important to them. For me, volunteering with the American Red Cross, American Cancer Society and for other smaller organizations is extremely important to me. I love helping my community and the people around me. Also, there are no classes for technical theatre or theatre design in my school, but if one takes a look at my extracurriculars list they would see that I have participated, back stage, in every production at my high school since my freshman year.

Comment by: Liz Holmes at June 11, 2006 5:53 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?