The Long March to Credibility (...goes on)
High school taught me to read EVERYTHING writen on the page of the assigned readings. (Okay, really AP Government 12 taught me to do this, but still...) I found the most important part of this reading assignment found in a section box (one of those pieces that is kinda just there, to give you insight, but that most students pass over.)
Found on page 157 of A History of News, The Long March to Credibility, tells of how journalists have had to earn their "credibility" that not all of them are out to just make a juicy story, and it also tells about how news became what it is. (At least this is what I got from it.) However it reads as follows.
"Yes, we continue to have our complaints about journalists. They get this or that fact wrong. They ignore something they should cover; they cover something we wish they would ignore. Nevertheless, we have come to more or less trust the information we receive in newspapers and newscasts and increasingly online. This book discusses a number of factors that have contributed to the growing credibility of news. The first was writing, which enabled stories to be preserved over distances. The next was printing press, with its ability to make exact copies. This chapter discusses the contributions the newspaper made to the credibility of the news. Two developments in later centuries would also play key roles; the telegraph and the development of reporting. Radio and cable television, then, made sure this information would be available to us 24 hours a day; satellites spread it around the world. It took a few thousand years, but human beings have finally succeedes in constructing a news system upon which they can-more or less, most of the time-rely.
So that took longer to type out then expected. But the point is, it was MUCH easier for me to type that out then to type out this whole book. Personally, I think that little box makes more sense than the entire thing. Maybe its my ADD, or maybe its my inability to actually care about the HISTORY of news. Either way, that's all I needed out of this book to understand how news become news, and how journalists struggle to get their good names out there. Alright, I got it. I would much rather read about the future of news, than the history. There's nothing I can do about the history, I mean it happened, its over. However the future is where I plan on making my mark, lets talk about how I'm going to do that instead.
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: The Long March to Credibility (...goes on).
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Its harder to have blog discussions in Media Lab, maybe these classes should be bigger. All my media Lab blogs since the last portfolio. First the chapter reviews... Intro through chapter nine Chapters ten and eleven Chapters 12 -... Read More