December 29, 2006

The end of an era.

In early 2001, Middle East analyst Gerald Butt wrote on the BBC, "In a region where despotic rule is the norm, he is more feared by his own people than any other head of state." He quoted a former Iraqi diplomat living in exile: "'Saddam is a dictator who is willing to sacrifice his country, just so long as he can remain on his throne in Baghdad.'"

He was recently convicted for the massacre of 148 Shiite Muslims - the opposition to his Sunni Ba'athist party, but he is responsible for a horrific number of deaths. His crimes include the genocide of as many as two hundred thousand ethnic Kurds in two campaigns - one in 1988 and one immediately after the Persian Gulf War.Do you remember how he killed them? He killed them with nerve gasses - mustard gas and sarin. His regime was notorious for its methods of torture, which included acid baths and professional rapists. He murdered his own son-in-law. Reports that he fed political opponents into industrial meat grinders and wood chippers have never been satisfactorily proved, but significant evidence to this point was introduced at his trial.

Tonight at just past 10 PM the word went out to the world that Saddam is dead, hanged for his recent conviction. CBS's Katie Couric broadcast the report I heard, and she was careful to point out that he was accused of genocide and torture. In the face of the dozens of mass graves that have turned up in Iraq in the last three and a half years, I am dumbfounded by her inability to own up to the fact that Saddam was actually a murderous despot. Of course, her predecessor is Dan Rather, who was granted a famously chummy interview with Saddam right before the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. But, looking beyond Katie Couric's lack of moral courage and inability to call a spade a spade or a brutal dictator a brutal dictator....

Many say that the death of Saddam will have no positive effects on the path to establishing a free, stable Iraq. I think we can afford to be cautiously optimistic. Those who are working to rebuild Iraq haven't had much of a psychological boost in a long time. With Saddam's death the people of Iraq can finally close the door on three blood-soaked decades and look forward. With Saddam's death the people of Iraq can finish freeing themselves of the long shadow he casts on their national consciousness. The changes may not be immediate, but they will come.

Posted by MeganRitter at December 29, 2006 11:03 PM


Comments

Why don't you enlist?

Posted by: Mike Sichok at January 2, 2007 1:11 PM

That's a fair question, Mike. There are several ways to answer it.
On a personal level, I can tell you that I tried to apply to the U.S. Naval Academy and was told that I am medically unfit to serve.

But I'm sure you don't mean that on a strictly personal level. I think it's fair that anyone who supports the war would be willing to fight and die for this country, should they need to, should they be asked to. However, I don't think it's a cop-out to say that not everyone in this country who supports the war SHOULD serve in the military. The men and women in the U.S. military are the very best of the best. Many of us who would like to be in the military should not be there because we are not physically and intellectually up to the challenge of serving. Bringing it back to the personal level, when I was in high school I wanted nothing more than to be in the military - my father was an Air Force sergeant in Vietnam, and I wanted to follow in his footsteps. But, quite simply, when I run, my airways start to close up. Everyone around me would suffer for my inability to keep up. Someone else might die for my inability to keep up. The military runs on the principle that everyone gives his (or her) best at all times. And some people's best is simply not good enough to be effective in the military. It's not fair to say that anyone could serve if they wanted to. It takes a very special person to do a soldier's job. I'm not equal to it. Most of us aren't. If you ask a soldier on the front lines if they would like every person in America who supports the war to be in Iraq with them, they will tell you no. Most of us would be no use to them. Their lives depend on the fact that only the very best among us join the military.

Posted by: Megan Ritter at January 2, 2007 10:59 PM