Electronic literature part two:In depth examination: My Body by Shelley Jackson
Investigate for 30 minutes
*added additional information due to assignment overlap (10/4)*
What sets Jackson's work apart from all the other hypertext fiction work I have encountered is that each section can stand alone. Each link is a separate anecdotal story. "My Body" is essentially an anthology of sexual, discovery, and identity stories. I have no doubt that it could easily translate to paper.
(I went down the "hip" path)
The author's tortured soul agonizingly recounts experiences with her body, often degrading her own while comparing it to models. A detail in the hip path leads to shaving legs. That story was a little horrifying, having to picture a woman who loves her leg hair and attempts to braid and/or dreadlock it. Just from reading those two short sections, the reader can tell the "author" has body image issues. She is different, yet her thinking is influence by society. She hates her hips because they don't match the images of perfection depicted in Greek art. What she probably doesn't know is that Greek art did not strive for realism (here comes a theater history tangent). It saw to correct reality, so in no way should a person strive to become a "Greek goddess". Mortals don't look like that, and never did.
Still, the affect of an image on a person is a powerful thing. Insecurness about hairy legs leads to insecureness about hair on other body parts, like the feet. (The more insecure the author got about her body, the deeper the reader dived). Once again, two conflicting images (hobbit and a girfriend) torture our "author" What was is the right way? There is no right way, because people's bodies differ, and can do unique things. While one person may be able to dance en-pointe, another may be able to play the piano with their feet.
The body is constantly experimenting. I'll spare you what this part was talking about experimenting with. But in this section was a link that ended the story: all tales connected by a single theme: possibility. Each click is a new discovery about the story, which in turn is a new discovery about the body.
That format was very effective. Graphic or non-graphic, not once did I pause and wonder whether a tale was necessary or relevant like in "The Heist". The main difference between "The Heist" and "My Body" is that not all elements in "The Heist" were well connected. I picture "The Body" as a map, where all points are part of the whole, and it is up to you to find the connections. But the connections are there.
In revisiting "The Body" today (due to the fact that it was actually assigned for monday and I chose it was a selection on wednesday because I dodn't look at monday's coursework first), I can see that through creating a hypertext exploration of the body, Shelley illustrated the deep insecurities and questions the character has. At first, most of the issues seems superficial and the author self-conscious, but as the links dig deeper, the reader finds that "The Body" is not about insecurities, but about discovery and acceptance. From insecurities comes wonder and question, which lead to new discoveries and acceptance. Every acceptance about the body utimately culminate in acceptance of yourself.
*added additional information due to assignment overlap (10/4)*
What sets Jackson's work apart from all the other hypertext fiction work I have encountered is that each section can stand alone. Each link is a separate anecdotal story. "My Body" is essentially an anthology of sexual, discovery, and identity stories. I have no doubt that it could easily translate to paper.
(I went down the "hip" path)
The author's tortured soul agonizingly recounts experiences with her body, often degrading her own while comparing it to models. A detail in the hip path leads to shaving legs. That story was a little horrifying, having to picture a woman who loves her leg hair and attempts to braid and/or dreadlock it. Just from reading those two short sections, the reader can tell the "author" has body image issues. She is different, yet her thinking is influence by society. She hates her hips because they don't match the images of perfection depicted in Greek art. What she probably doesn't know is that Greek art did not strive for realism (here comes a theater history tangent). It saw to correct reality, so in no way should a person strive to become a "Greek goddess". Mortals don't look like that, and never did.
Still, the affect of an image on a person is a powerful thing. Insecurness about hairy legs leads to insecureness about hair on other body parts, like the feet. (The more insecure the author got about her body, the deeper the reader dived). Once again, two conflicting images (hobbit and a girfriend) torture our "author" What was is the right way? There is no right way, because people's bodies differ, and can do unique things. While one person may be able to dance en-pointe, another may be able to play the piano with their feet.
The body is constantly experimenting. I'll spare you what this part was talking about experimenting with. But in this section was a link that ended the story: all tales connected by a single theme: possibility. Each click is a new discovery about the story, which in turn is a new discovery about the body.
That format was very effective. Graphic or non-graphic, not once did I pause and wonder whether a tale was necessary or relevant like in "The Heist". The main difference between "The Heist" and "My Body" is that not all elements in "The Heist" were well connected. I picture "The Body" as a map, where all points are part of the whole, and it is up to you to find the connections. But the connections are there.
In revisiting "The Body" today (due to the fact that it was actually assigned for monday and I chose it was a selection on wednesday because I dodn't look at monday's coursework first), I can see that through creating a hypertext exploration of the body, Shelley illustrated the deep insecurities and questions the character has. At first, most of the issues seems superficial and the author self-conscious, but as the links dig deeper, the reader finds that "The Body" is not about insecurities, but about discovery and acceptance. From insecurities comes wonder and question, which lead to new discoveries and acceptance. Every acceptance about the body utimately culminate in acceptance of yourself.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Electronic literature part two:In depth examination: My Body by Shelley Jackson.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.setonhill.edu/mt/mt_tb-awoisdlkfj.cgi/14454
I have to say that I disagree with you, Dani. Not totally, just in a small way. (I just interrupted the text differently.)
Where you say that Jackson is critizing herself throughout the piece, I saw each section of the body as her way of showing what she liked about herself. Though at some points she does think critically of what she looks like and what is going on with her body, the entire time I was reading, I didn't think once "oh this girl is like all the others that compare themselves to models," I thought that finally this shows girls that different is okay.
In the section about her arms, she comments about how other women wanted to be like her and asked her how she got her arms to be so tight and strong and were jealous when she said that's how she naturally is. I think that Jackson was able to see her own flaws, flaws that the public eye said she had (like the leg hair) but I also think that she was able to find a way to accept all of those things, because ultimately she liked who she was.
I felt that through this website, her form of art, she was trying to show other girls that imperfection is beauty; which is the total opposite view of what the Greeks did in their art work.
In revisiting the text today, I added the last paragraph
I like.