After reading chapters 2-4 I just wanted to post two questions that I derived from the reading.
How are we the audience supposed to know what research done by scientists or journalists is credible or just heresay? And how do we even know what research is done with proxy's?
I understand that we have to do our own research. But first and foremost, just like newsrooms we have deadlines and no one has time to do a background check on every single thing they read. Also what if you can't find any info?
I was just wondering if anyone else had these same questions when reading the book.
Posted by Denishia Salter at October 20, 2003 03:40 PM