February 26, 2005

HolocaustS

Wednesday’s (Feb. 23rd) Tribune-Review had a photograph and a short blurb on the Pope’s new book hitting the shelves. It read:

“A TV journalist takes a shot of Pope John Paul II’s newest book titled “Memory and Identity” in Rome Tuesday. The pontiff’s book, in which he likens abortion to a new Holocaust, has outraged Jewish groups appalled by what they say is a lack of understanding on the part of the Catholic Church.”

I wish to call attention to the fact that NO GROUP has a monopoly on the term “holocaust.” According to Merriam-Webster online, in section 3b (3a does mention the Jewish holocaust), holocaust is defined as “a mass slaughter.” Obviously, we are all aware of the Holocaust, and what the Nazis did against the Jews. In the above statement, the Jews are forgetting that there were other victims of Hitler, too. These include the disabled, Gypsies, Roman Catholics, and homosexuals.

However, there have been many holocausts throughout history. I wish to call attention to two during the 20th century: the GULAGs, and the lao gai. The GULAGs (the forced labor camps of the Soviet Union) were responsible for the deaths of anywhere between 15-35 million people, maybe more (since the GULAGs (although in full force under Stalin, and did decline somewhat after his death) were in fact, operating up until the collapse of the Soviet Union.) This death toll outnumbers the Holocaust. Even though both of these were atrocious, there is evidence that the Chinese GULAGs (called lao gai), killed twice as many Chinese as Stalin did of his own (as well as citizens of Soviet satellites and POWs), somewhere in the vicinity of 70 million, maybe more.

Abortion (which will probably outnumber any holocaust in all of human history, since over 30 million children have been killed in the U.S. alone, not including all over the world) is also a holocaust as well, since it too involves a mass slaughter. What happened to the Jews during WWII was horrible (having heard accounts from survivors and read literature on the subject). They are not alone. You will find accounts from GULAG survivors, etc. that are equally as horrific. So if the Pope wishes to compare abortion to a new Holocaust, he is perfectly free to do so and shouldn’t be criticized for using the word “…for a lack of understanding.” A mass slaughter is a mass slaughter, whether it be from concentration camps, GULAGs, lao gai, whatever.

Posted by EmilyKasky at February 26, 2005 2:58 PM
Comments

Exactly! When the rabbi said that at the panel discussion my first thought was "Since when do the Jews own the word Holocaust?" But, as always, we were thinking on the same wavelength. Way to go!

Posted by: Mike at February 26, 2005 4:20 PM

Well said, Emily. There's only one Discovery Channel version. (Hints: Hitler, Nazi, Treblinka, Eichmann, "Final Solution.") The true picture is much, much worse, and rarely given much press.

Posted by: Richard at July 17, 2005 10:22 PM

You make a great point, that is beyond true and i agree that the holocaust is no ones term to "trademark" or as you said have a monopoly over. However, it needs to be understood that some Jewish people don't have history majors and don't know about the gulags etc. and will take offense to something that to them is belittling the holocaust. And one needs to take care to not refer to the the jewish population as a whole as guilty of forgetting about the suffering of others throughout history. I'm Jewish and I know about these holocausts of the past and am activily involved in projects to end genocide in Darfur so it is not all the Jews that are monopolizing the word holocaust.

Posted by: Sarah at April 23, 2007 10:24 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?