Can this person be saved?

| | Comments (0)
"And this leads to the point of the last chance for change story... can this person be saved?" (Foster 230)


No. The answer is no. That is all I can think of as I read this passage. Honestly, I don't believe in "last chance for change" because there is truly never a last chance when it comes to change. People are continually changing. Sometimes that change comes to late, but there is never a last chance.

Another part of me wants to say that some people just don't change. Foster referenced a story which the narrator's brother served time for drugs and has since changed his life to become a jazz musician. The narrator  only  reconnected with his brother after the death of his daughter. While this sounds nice and wonderful, this is not real life. I hate that people always talk about the "last chance for change" stories when they speak about drug culture. That is how lives get ruined.

Talk to any relative of a drug user and they still refer the previous drug user as an addict. Once an addict, always an addict. Believing in the last chance for change will only hurt you more. I used to be one of those people who was always looking for the happy ending. It took many years to realize that sometimes there just aren't happy endings. You can't waste your life on someone who cannot help them self.  "Last chance for change" stories simply add to the addicts plea for sympathy. When they say they are doing better,  that they have  changed, you can never truly be sure.

I'm not sure why I decided to take this into a rant, but I guess I have a hatred for "last chance for change" stories.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

 

November 2009

Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
[1] 2 3 [4] 5 6 [7]
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Brain-Rot

EL 266

"While England endeavors to cure the potato-rot, will not any endeavor to cure the brain-rot, which prevails so much more widely and fatally?" (Thoreau, ch 18 paragraph 7)

Yes, I agree once again with Thoreau. I think his point here is that society focuses to cure problems that may appear to be the most important, but in truth are not. He was referring to the Great Potato Famine that occurred in Ireland during 1845 -1852. The famine not only caused people to starve, lose jobs and economic status, but also caused a wave of English and Irish immigrants to America.  England, who received many crops from Ireland, was concerned about this problem on an economic scale. Their focus was on solving this problem, not educating the public.

I can see this happening today as well. Because of the "economic crisis" we are struggling so hard to put money into Federal Relief funds such as grocery assistance, cash assistance, and housing assistance. Our focus is on building up these programs so that those who have lost jobs (or those who live off the system) will be supported during this tough time. We should instead be focusing on educating them, so that when minimum wage jobs are cut, they can go to college, earn a degree, and find a better, higher paying job.

Many people believe that because they qualify to receive government benefits, they are entitled to them for life. They simply feel that they cannot go back to work for one reason or another. Our society has made it so easy for this to happen that almost anyone can claim that they are "unable to work." This is exactly the kind of brain-rot that Thoreau was speaking of. With a little bit of education and a shove, many more Americans can find themselves contributing to society.

Blogroll

Categories