I noticed in the "Cap on Bonuses Inflates PNC Pay" that some of the sources for the quotations were a little vague. The reporter referred to some of his sources as just "analysts" instead of being more specific. The article was packed full of statisitics, and some of them just seemed to be floating on their own instead of tied down to a source. Although I'm sure to readers that "analysts" would be a convincing enough source while reading, I still found it interesting in comparison to the Planes article which seemed to have every statistic linked to a named source. After reading the two back to back, it just seemed like the Planes statisitics were more reliable because it seemed like a lot of information about the source was presented, where as the PNC reporter didn't refer to or describe the sources in as much detail.