Harmless joke vs. heartfelt satire - difference?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
"The problem was that if someone made a sarcastic remark, a few readers would fail to get the joke, and each of them would post a lengthy diatribe in response. That would stir up more people with more responses, and soon the original thread of the discussion was buried."


"Many people have denounced the very idea of the smiley face, pointing out that good writers should have no need to explicitly label their humorous comments. Shakespeare and Jonathan Swift and Mark Twain got along just fine without this. And by labeling the remarks that are not meant to be taken seriously, we spoil the joke. In satirical writing, half the fun is in never being quite sure whether the author is serious or not."

~ History/Scott Fahlman


It's a classic to be sure; people not understanding or getting the joke. I, myself, am quite a fan of saracasm. So, it's only natural that that walks hand in hand with satire and the rest of its ilk. I have had the misfortune of people failing to get the joke and thus being affronted and more often than not, wanting some type of retribution.

The way I see it, is that this situation is similar to trolling. Trolls intentionally stir things up and drop comments to achieve this goal. However, the main difference would be that people's everyday writing may supposed to be funny, but only ends in someone's raised hackles. Stahlman's creation and use of the smiley emoticon provided a needed service that continues to this day. The thread of discussion and the disemination of ideas was able to contine without people ripping each other to shreds over a flat joke. Then again, I believe that the use of the smiley has changed somewhat. People nowadays use smileys in chat rooms and various networking posts in order to represent happiness or something that is more obvious a joke.

Unfortunately, I also agree with the second quote above. Have the fun of sarcasm and the rest is never actually knowing whether someone is serious or not. I'd like to think it all adds up to the mystery of individual people (and subsequently life); I can freely admit that there are things that come out of my mouth that I'm not really sure whether I mean them or not until after they've been said. I find it discouraging, almost detestable that there are increasing moments when I must explain to others what it is I'm joking or referencing about. I know I'm scatterbrained and that my mind has the tendency to jumps tracks seemingly without purpose from one thing to the next, but come on! I don't want to lose what little mystery we have yet to destroy in today's world.

I suppose that it all comes down to society's expectations and individual preferences. I'd much rather be an autonomous being than to conform to that which provides little room for humor. Smileys were great, as is the subsequent and on-going evolution of them, but does anyone else think that maybe people have simply lost a bit of the ability to read and discern tone of voice for themselves?


Alright, you've been a good reader and listened to my prattling on, so I'll take ya back now. Just remember, I own the PORTAL! >_^

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Harmless joke vs. heartfelt satire - difference?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.setonhill.edu/mt/mt_tb-awoisdlkfj.cgi/14286

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by MadelynGillespie published on September 17, 2008 10:14 AM.

Gnomes!? There're gnomes in the garden! Look at the prints on the carpet! was the previous entry in this blog.

Tone of voice won't sound right to everyone. No matter what. is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.13