transperancy, is it clear at all?
often times a friend I've known had been accused of being too "obvious." People said she's predictable, but does an often proven "conjecture" of a given course be necessarily true/right?
In T.V. broadcasting (as from what I learned from two days of being in Newswriting), they showed stunning visuals and if not, just any image pertinent to what they call "news." It's true that pictures hold a thousand words. what if someone has a limited vocabulary?
from the outward appearance, can one tell of another's inner workings?is it enough for the superficial evaluation of others?
there are ways to manipulate images? does manipulation do more harm or not?
one can hide in images...giving an "impreesion"...tricking the eye to see what it wants to see.
it's obvious that someone can be ditzy, but who's tricking who and who's taken for the fool?
Posted by Michael Diezmos at September 2, 2005 12:27 PM