January 5, 2004

Fear of Boredom

Posted by Michael Arnzen at 17:26 in Praxis.

People ask me all the time why I choose to write bizarre fiction and poetry, and an answer I find myself routinely giving is that I'm deathly afraid of being boring and while horror fiction is a lot of things, good and bad, it's rarely boring.

This fear of boredom also motivates my teaching style, which I'd like to believe is very active and energetic. I work hard to generate student interest in my class material and the more "boring" the material, the more "exciting" I try to make it through humor, group activities, live readings, and animated lectures. I always juggle approaches, one day putting the class in a circle to discuss, while maybe doing a straightforward lecture the next, and maybe holding class outside the day after that. Sometimes I feel like I'm a motivational speaker for critical thinking more than a teacher in the traditional sense of the word. Heck, I even sometimes try to get students to openly discuss what that word, "boring," really means (especially if I ever hear a student say that a reading or film I assigned "bored" them...). Sometimes my classes can get into controversial territories and students might not like what they hear, but they still can count on the fact that I won't stand in front of the class and just lecture as if talking to a brick wall.

In my web research on this topic, I discovered a great article called "Confessions of a Bore" (*pdf format) -- an article submitted anonymously by a professor to the Winter 2003 issue of Speaking of Teaching, (a newsletter put out by Stanford U's Center for Teaching and Learning). This article illustrated in many ways the reasons why I am afraid of being a bore -- primarily, because it is the "moral responsibility" of the teacher not to waste another human being's time:

A moral responsibility? Committing dullness is a
serious act, I thought then and still think, because you
cause the listener to wish part of his or her life away, to
be drawn toward an attenuated, granular form of suicide.
Bores are torturers. The bore—or to specify further: the
deadly bore—does something so dreadful to time that it
would have been more merciful simply to kill it. The
more vividly one holds in mind the preciousness and
finitude of lived time, the less one can condone boring
anyone for any reason.

"Confessions of a Bore" is a wonderful reminder that teaching is -- and must be -- performative, active, and audience-conscious. Ultimately, being performative doesn't just entertain students -- it models what it means to be excited about knowledge, research, and practice.

This article appears in a special issue, "Why Teachers Have Bad Classes." Related theme issues from Stanford's CTL program include "Active Learning" and "Capturing and Directing the Motivation to Learn"

Trackback Pings

You can ping this entry by using .

Comments

"...models what it means to be excited about knowledge, research,and practice." So important. Students won't get into the material at a deep level if they aren't excited about it. Great PDF files on the Stanford link you provided--specially Socratic Method and Cooperative Group files. We elementary school teachers are working hard to develop and model higher level thinking through the Socratic Method as used in Isabel Beck's "Queries." Using Beck's "discussion moves" like "turning back"--turning responsibility for developing and clarifying an idea (during a group discussion/cooperative group activity) back to the student by asking, for example, "can you tell me where the author implies that?" or "marking"--marking an interesting idea by asking, "Can you tell us more about that?" Beginning with grade 1 we're spending more time having students delve deeper into texts and discuss the writer's intentions, both implicit and explicit, and how those ideas connect with real world concepts and experiences. Hopefully, their ability to think more deeply and make connections will transfer into their writing as we help students make connections between stylistic choices an author used to develop an idea and the effectiveness of their own stylic choices in doing the same. I think excitement goes both ways--students will be more excited about information they can connect to at a deeper level. So it behooves us to develop this ability early on.

Posted by Nancy at 01:15 on January 6, 2004. #

Have you read Patricia Spacks's book on boredom? She was writing it while I was taking a course in the British novel from her, so I imagine she tried out some of her material on us.

http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/12763.ctl

Posted by Dennis G. Jerz at 01:49 on January 6, 2004. #

Great book suggestions, Dennis and Nancy! Thanks. I look forward to checking out both Queries and Boredom. Indeed, they're related: Raising questions is precisely how one combats boredom for one's self, no? (oops, notice how I just put that into question form, too). Active inquiry is at the heart of critical thinking and impels intellectual curiosity.

Posted by Mike Arnzen at 21:34 on January 6, 2004. #

Amen, amen, amen, and amen! When I began teaching, I vowed that I'd never be the guy who runs off the same worksheets every year, assigns the same projects to every class, and uses the same procedure every day. Even as a math teacher, I bend over backward to vary my approach and give the kids a show. In an age of instant information and info-tainment, teachers have to either pick up the pace or lose the kids five minutes into every class...

Posted by Catholic School Blogger at 13:33 on January 10, 2004. #

Post a comment










Remember this information?

(requires cookies)