Wikipedia is a fraud
"I have no idea whose sick mind conceived the false, malicious "biography" that appeared under my name for 132 days on Wikipedia, the popular, online, free encyclopedia whose authors are unknown and virtually untraceable".
As for the poor soul of John Seigenthaler whose biography was placed on Wikipedia clearly exaggerated a little on his life. Wikipedia isn't the most reliable source of information online. For one, anyone including myself can post an entry. Encyclopedias are supposed to have relevant, correct information on a topic. For example, an igloo, is typically everything this wikipedia article says it is. However, I can change the entire entry, claiming an igloo is an orange sod house people in the African safari that people live in. Some small child or even oblivious adult could write a report on an igloo claiming it is a sod house in the safari. The cite of the source says it is from wikipedia, which can be changed by any human being. If wikipedia continues to exist, will the future generation believe everything they find on this online encylopidia? It's like an online rumor that changes and morphs in time, eventually forming wrong conclusions in people's heads. Relating back to John Seigenthaler whose biography online is false. People who do not know him, conclude his life to be as it is on wikipedia because they are naive and know no different. Sometimes, it only takes one mistake to know the efficiency of one product.