Main

October 19, 2007

Name the New Campus Portal!

This morning I found this in my e-mail in box (no, I'd rather not call it an "inbox").

NAME THE NEW CAMPUS PORTAL! Win CASH for Renaming JWeb Want to leave a lasting mark on the Hill? Now's your chance, and you can win a $100 gift card in the process.

Seton Hill University will be upgrading JWeb and CampusConnect into one new information portal in June 2008, and we want YOU to name it! Submit the catchiest, snappiest, most apt name for our new portal and you'll not only add a new word to our campus lexicon, but also win a $100 Visa Gift Card.

The "J" in JWeb stands for Jenzabar, which is our not-exactly-beloved course management system. Campus Connect is our internal database, where we report grades and see what students have signed up for our courses.

Entering your idea is easy:

+ If you could rename JWeb or CampusConnect, what would you call it? Invent a snappy, catchy title that aptly describes what it is that a portal page combining JWeb and CampusConnect does. You might consider how other large websites (MySpace, Yahoo, iTunes, Google) are named, but originality counts.

+ How will your new name relate to Seton Hill? Names that specifically tie into the college's university's mission, institutional history, and unique identity will be more likely to win. You might turn to the campus catalog, local landmarks, or the university website for inspiration.

+ How will the name be interpreted? Avoid profanity, slurs, double-entendres, or any language that might potentially offend others.

SUBMIT as many entries as you like by e-mail to contest@setonhill.edu. Anyone attached to SHU can enter. The DEADLINE is November 20th at 6pm. Include your proposed name(s) for the new portal, your own full name, and the mailing address to send your prize if you are chosen as the winner!

November 9, 2005

SITA: Students In The Arts: possible misconception

What is SITA? it's a club that focuses on ART. I think there's a misconception about this club. This club is open to all students not just art majors. Just because it said students in the arts, it's not necessarily for art majors. The club's objective deals with art exposure in all forms.

If anyone has questions, please ask me or Sarah Elwood or Athena Singer. If anyone is intereseted in joining or in making gift wrapping papers today Wednesday Nov. 9, contact me or any of the people above.

Thanks! :)

July 24, 2005

Giving NMJ a Makeover...

How many people out there think that the blog you are reading now looks a little... um, bland? Yes... after almost three years, the NMJ blog looks exactly the same. I have proposed to Dr. Jerz a design concept--because I have waaaaay too much time on my hands! =') A working prototype is available for critiquing. Just follow this link and leave any complaints, suggestions, or stark-raving praises as comments in this entry.

Thank you,

Evan

Update: The new homepage is on index.php.

February 19, 2005

Wake Up SHU Artists!

what's the dealio? I know it's winter but why are guys hibernating? Yesterday, Friday February 18 was the deadline for Eye Contact's Consequences.

I found out that we only had ten art submissions, TEN! I was quite disappointed considering that SHU is a liberal arts university and has a strong Art curriculum and foundation.

Don't make excuses about not knowing about it. I placed three large and popping posters (which are very unique and unconventional in comparison to the regular 8 by 11.5" flyers) in strategic places (the post office, 2nd Maura "Solarium" and ground level Lynch) where people often pass or congregate atleast once in a day. In the past, you've seen posters, people have "pestered" you about donations (thank you very much for your donations, we're always grateful for them!), some of your art teachers have made announcements, and Eye Contacts representatives have visited your classrooms.

There have been advertisements in The Setonian and The Communicator. Word of mouth is also prevalent.

I'm pro "subjective" art, art for personal use, art to express oneself etc. Don't feel that having a theme such as "consequences" is in any way restrictive or belittling your artistic style/ inclination. Just remember some of the great artists in the past, such as Michelangelo (Pope Julius pushed him to make the best art for his personal collection and in doing so Michelangelo strived to do his personal best and he did as he matured as an artist). Having "commissions" was the way artists thrived in their craft, and it was how they gained experience. It was how they learned. In a positive way think of Eye Contact as "commissioning" you to do an art work that deals with "consequences."

I urged you to submit artworks you'd be proud of, and most likely it''ll have a "consequential" theme. What are you afraid of? Consequences may favor you and your artwork, next thing you know you may be published. Other consequences may be a rejection letter. So what, the rejection letter is objective, it doesn't say anything personal, however it only states that the artwork was irrelevant to the theme.

Consequences. I just hope SHU artists respond to their calling of being artists, making art and sharing it for others' edification, enlightenment, and salvation. Save us from the enniu of a world lacking art!

February 25, 2004

Sistine Chapel Images

"The Creation of Adam" in context -- Sistine Chapel

In my Media Aesthetics course, we briefly discussed the Creation of Adam, which is one panel on a large ceiling display. The untility I've linked to above is a free tool that lets you add images, sort them around, and zoom in and out. Sort of like "Coloforms" or Sunday-school flannel boards.

February 24, 2004

Aesthetic Distance: the Veil of Weird Grotesqueness

Encyclopædia Britannica defines "aesthetic distance" as the following: “the frame of reference that an artist creates by the use of technical devices in and around the work of art to differentiate it psychologically from reality.” It is said more clearly on the Tri-County Community College Major English Writer’s page. A handout on aesthetic distance defines the term as, “the psychological and emotional distance between the text and the reader.”

Edward Bullough is the man who coined the term and in his “'Psychical Distance' as a Factor in Art and an Aesthetic Principle”, he states that this principle makes it possible for dangerous situations to be appreciated aesthetically. For example, an audience can enjoy a play based on Dante’s “Inferno” even though in reality, hell is a place of torture, a place where no one would send even their worst enemies. The audience can view the play objectively, appreciating the beauty of the play while staying a comfortable distance away from the real and proverbial flames.

Bullough uses a fog at sea as his example. Of course a fog at sea is a very disconcerting thing for sailors. Its presence leaves ships’ crews feel vulnerable to unseen elements such as icebergs and the chill it brings is most unpleasant. Yet, a fog at sea, depicted in the art form of the second dimension, gives a comfortable distance to the 3D reality from which it is viewed. Thus, a piece of art, even one which depicts a scene, which in real life, would bring out unwanted emotions, may be viewed as quite beautiful.

Aesthetic distance, says Bullough, is “the veil [which] surround[s] you with an opaqueness as of transparent milk, blurring the outline of things and distorting their shapes into weird grotesqueness.” What a great line! Anyway, another example he gave in his essay was that of one climbing a mountain for enjoyment. It fatigue’s the climber, but he doesn’t think of the pain, only the enjoyment of the climb.

It reminds me of Orwell’s 1984 “doublethink” concept, which Orwell describes as the "power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them." It allows a person to disregard thoughts which bring, if dwelled upon, confusion and discomfort, even though they are very real and true. So, people are trained from birth to brainwash themselves into believing what they are told, no matter how unrealistic it is. Bullough calls this concept “hypocritically denying” [the truth]. This denial of uncomfortable parts of reality naturally lends to deception, the essence of good fiction in my opinion.

February 3, 2004

Geistesgeschichte -Are you telling me “God Bless You” or a literary term?


Here is the definition Dr. Jerz was so kind to send me.

When I volunteered to do this presentation I was expecting to find it a little bit more information when I entered “Reception Theory” into the box on Google’s site. Then I read one very confusing article on it. It deals with the finding of the practice of reception theory and the men who were responsible. Hans Robert Jauss, with his University of Constance colleagues Manfred Fuhrmann and Wolfgang Iser. html I think it was confusing for me because of the sprinkling of a few German words to explain the theory. Since I am unfamiliar with German, than this article left me in a bit of a bind.

I tweaked my search a little bit to include reader response and reception theory and I happened upon a clear cut easy to understand “English for Dummies” blatant article. Basically the article found on the Arts and Culture network website tells us how that it is the readers job to interpret the text. That without the reader the text is nothing. Sort of similar to Brendan’s presentation on Monday.

All of us come from different backgrounds so therefore our interpretations of a text should be different. And it is because of Reception theory that allows us to do so. It is basically like our favorite teacher growing up as a child that coddled us and told us there are never any wrong answers.

It is this type of way of approaching texts that allows authors such as Shakespeare and Chaucer to be so relevant to today. If we didn’t try and tweak and fit a text to fit our needs the text would probably be stale and be left in the dust forever.

Reception theory as whole puts a subjective slant on an objective text. By being subjective the reader colors the text to fit their expectations. The text becomes like an inkblot in their mind’s eye. They will see the text one way because they believe they want to see it that one way and no way else.

To be slightly off topic it is sort of how urban legends are born. For example everyone probably has heard about the “hanging munchin/electrician” in Wizard of Oz. We look for it and the minute we see something that may resemble it than our mind fills in the blanks for us and we believe it to be true. Another example is from the Lion King, when Simba lays down on the cliff and seeds and grass float into the air and supposedly spell out the word SEX. We have been told over and over how it is “supposed” to mean.

So when it comes time for us to interpret it for ourselves we stumble over our feet. We get lost and confused. But the important thing to remember is, if you do stumble, you have to get up, dust yourself off and try again.

February 2, 2004

Canterbury Tales Translations

Here's a good link to interlinear translations of some of the Canterbury Tales. Wife of Bath is definitely on here...these are handy because you can read the Middle English and then look down a line when you don't get it. Or, Middle English speakers can look up when they don't understand...

February 1, 2004

Aesthetic Distance (Bet most of U don't know what this is)

Aesthetic Distance is a literary term that I had never heard of until now. When I looked it up I found a very complicated definition of it here. I had to reread this definition a few times before I understood what it meant. In a nut shell what its saying is that it’s the desired distance between the reader’s perspective and the reality of the piece of literature or artwork that they are interacting with. You see when we look at artwork, read, or watch a play we know it’s not real, but we can’t help but feel drawn into it the reality of the piece of artwork. The reason we must have this distance is so that we as the audience can have an objective response to something that is subjective. If you still are lost go here to a site I found most helpful. Also click here to see how Aesthetics relates to the theater and why it’s so important. Both sites helped me to understand the term and come up with the definition I summarized here.

From Aesthetic Distance we can move on to a form of literary criticism connected to it called “New Criticism” (yes I know, it’s not a very creative name is it). What’s the connection you ask? Well “New Criticism” (NC) treats a piece of literature as its own unique reality or a self contained, self- referential object. Instead of thinking about what the author intended or how the historical context relates to the meaning, these critics closely read, concentrating on the relationships within the text that give it its own distinctive character or form. New Critics emphasize that the structure of a work should not be divorced from meaning, viewing the two as constituting a quasi-organic unity (two living beings or entities). Special attention is paid to repetition, particularly of images or symbols, but also of sound effects and rhythms in poetry. (I pulled this from here and the site has a much longer definition of this criticism if you want to take a look). So now we begin to see how NC connects to Aesthetic Distance. Literary these critics are taking a literary term and using it as a base for a new form of literary criticism. NC rejects any intentions the author had and looks just at the literature an entity with a purpose or specific design. Check out this link to get all the basics of NC as well as some history about how it came about.

New Critics coined a term I came across as I was reading up on this form of criticism called “Intentional Fallcy”. Basically the term describes the problem of judging a work upon the attentions of the artist who created it. Meaning should be determined from close reading of text, careful viewing of a piece of art, or critically analyzing a play you’re watching; it should not be determined by the intentions of the artist who put together the piece of artwork. In other words we see all art as having “dead artists.” New Critics Wimsatt and Beardsley were the ones who created this term. In short the text means what it says, bottom line. For an extended analysis of this literary term check out this piece of writing here.

So I bet many of you artists out there are feeling kind of low now, huh? To think that you are unimportant in the mind of your audience is kind of an ego crusher. But don’t fret because it is your creations that give audiences something to interpret, without artists people would have nothing to interpret. So don’t feel down about yourself (Because I know I do). Those pompous know nothing critics wouldn’t have anything to argue about if you didn’t express your creative imagination through your art. It’s the artists’ job to create and the audiences’ job to interpret.


There was one other term I found in surfing, but I couldn’t find enough information on it except a weblog. If you want to learn about “Willing Suspension of Disbelief” check out a blog done by cjed. That should give you a good starting point for this term.

January 26, 2004

Modern Illumination

The major art form for literature has for centuries been the book. In ancient times, written language was displayed on scrolls of papyrus, a type of paper made from the papyrus plant. It wasn't until the Medieval Era that books became a popular way of displaying literature. Once books became popular, they stayed popular, surviving and changing throughout the centuries as technology expanded and tastes changed. Today's books, for instance, are vastly different from the books of the Medieval Age. In this presentation, I'll look at how books are designed and bound, both in the modern day and in the Medieval Era.

Design

Medieval books were written on vellum or parchment. Both are specially treated animal skins that were stretched taut and trimmed into the proper shape. Here is an example of a modern recreation of vellum. The vellum was ruled, sometimes with colored inks, so that the text would be level and straight.The text itself was written by hand with a quill, or a feather from a goose or a swan. The quill's nib, or the sharpened point, created the shape of the text. This often varied, depending on the shape and angle of the nib.

This is vastly different from modern day printing. Modern books are printed using a mechanical press onto paper made from pulped wood. The paper is cut mechanically.

Illumination and Illustration

Illumination is a technique used in Medieval illustrations. Medieval books were generally filled with illustrations in the margins and the body of the text. These illustrations were often illuminated by using silver and gold leaf. The background of these illustrations is usually solid gold or silver leaf, while the foreground and content of the illustrations were made of pigments mixed with egg whites to form a kind of tempera paint.

Modern books often aren't illustrated. Children's books and some young adult books are illustrated, usually with photo-printed paper or reproductions of paintings. Some books have dividers on chapter pages, usually a small graphic that doesn't take up much of the page. For the most part, modern books remain unillustrated, with the exception of cover art. Modern books pride themselves on their cover art, which is usually bright and eye-catching to attract a buyer. I'll go into this again in Binding.

Binding

In Medieval binding, the parchment were folded and nested into sections called "gatherings". These were sewn together with leather thongs and then attatched to wooden boards that formed the front and back covers of the book. The covers were then covered with dyed fabric or leather, and decorated with metalwork on the corners of the covers and on the center of the front cover.

Modern binding is a bit different. The printed pages are trimmed and folded, and then attatched to an adhesive spine, which may be sewn to add further support. The spine is attatched to the cover, which is geither made of board or cardstock, depending on whether the book is a hard or paper back. If the binding is a hardback, the cover comes with a dustjacket, that contains the cover art and spine art, along with a short summary on one flap and a brief introduction to the author on the other flap. The back cover also contains art and information. On a paperback book, the cover art and summary are printed straight onto the cardstock and covered with a laminate to make it long lasting.

Archiving

Medieval books were archived only in the houses or manors of the very wealthy or in the monasteries where they were created. In monasteries, books were kept in Scriptoriums, where they could be copied by hand and distributed to other churches or patrons.

Modern books are archived in libraries, such as the Library of Congress in the United States, or smaller libraries that spend many years expanding their collections. These books are often on public display and can be borrowed for reading from a public library. Some libraries do not lend their books to the public, but do allow the public to view them.

Here is a more in-depth look at the creation of a Medieval text.

Here are some examples of modern bindings and cover art.

January 25, 2004

I Once Was Blind...

Since my Media Aesthetics students have been reading and blogging about vision and blindness, I though I'd share this journal I found last year...


"[E]excuse me, I just got my sight back last week after being totally blind for 43 years. Could you help me figure out what I am seeing?" -- Mike May

[A fascinating excerpt:
I found it very distracting to look at people’s faces when I was having a conversation. I can see their lips moving, eye lashes flickering, head nodding and hands gesturing. First, I tried looking down and if it was a woman, a low cut top would be even more distracting. It was easiest to close my eyes or tune out the visual input. This was necessary often in order to pay attention to what they were saying. I am sure there will come a time when all this visual communication will mean more to me but for now it is just distracting.
May's description of the visual component of music (via a marching band), his musings on a game of catch, and his new reaction to the previously meaningless pleasantry "Nice to see you" are all quite interesting.

Another fascinating passage:

When I noticed dark patches behind me, it didn’t register right away that these were my footprints. I never thought of footprints as images other than when reading about them in an old west novel. To me, they were the thump; pivot push and the texture of the sand on my foot not dark splotches following me around like a shadow.

January 19, 2004

"EL309: Media Aesthetics" SHU Blogs

EL 309: Media Aesthetics

Instructor: Dennis G. Jerz

January 17, 2004

Disney is Cooler than Plato

Globalization is great. I can sample foods from cultures all around the world, right in my local mall. This article from The Christian Science Monitor argues that globalization means America is forcing its values on the outside world. We exporting democracy, equality for women, and gospel of capitalist economics... what could be wrong with that?

In 2,000 years, will the world remember Disney or Plato? | csmonitor.com

If it took two millenniums for Plato's "Republic" to reach North America, the latest hit from Justin Timberlake can be found in Greek (and Japanese) stores within days. Sometimes, US ideals get transmitted - such as individual rights, freedom of speech, and respect for women - and local cultures are enriched. At other times, materialism or worse becomes the message and local traditions get crushed.

Continue reading "Disney is Cooler than Plato" »

January 16, 2004

Who knew you could connect over a tongue?

I'm currently taking PY 225, or Infant, Child and Adolescent Developement. One of the things we have to do for this class in work for an hour a week down at the CDC and shadow one of the children, then write a case study on that child. I have found my child. We met when I stuck my tongue out at him and he did the same to me. Yes... it was beautiful. ^_^

I've been thinking about "Media Aesthetics", mostly stemming from the fact that I've been watching the extras on the extended "Lord of the Rings" DVD. It's interesting, the kind of care and work that's put into the design of the entire movie. I loved the way they utilised natural forms in all of the elf sets. And that each of the specific cultures had a specific and different design, so that all you had to do was look at a building/cloak/dress/weapon and you would know it came from a specific culture. In the same way, I've been looking at other things. For instance, my blog.

For some reason, it strangely resembles my livejournal (which I won't be giving out, ladies and gents. Too many secrets, don't ya know?). So, my own style is symple, but... pretty? Dunno. Too much to think about at the moment.

The whole concept of aesthetics is relatively new to me. I just go by what "Feels right" when I'm designing something. If it clicks for me, then I go with it. If not, I chuck it. The whole idea that there's philosophy behind it rather boggled my mind. It'll take a few more classes for me to work that into my rants.

Odd. I seem to have acquired an Brittish accent in this blog. Huh. Isn't that interesting?