Alright, last
one here, and lets say this was the one I was most excited for (although I hope
that doesn't convey that I hated each reading and so forth), but yes, I was a
little "geeked" about the kindle. I really hadn't read any reviews or
encountered anyone who has used it, or even owned one, but I suppose Amazon's
target market is for those who need something more aside from their laptop,
palm pilot, Ipod etc. Meaning, that poor young America really doesn't have the
resources to get one. But enough of that, lets starting reviewing the product.
Aesthetics:
The kindle comes in a protective cover, with a strap that secure the
cover from opening, The cover is visually reminiscent of those out-dated and "old-school"
books. The cover is black and sleek, which provides a sense of professionalism
and sleekness. Which really
translates to you wont look like that big of a dork carrying one around, well
no more so than carry your average paperback. Alright, lets open it up.
Ok,
the kindle itself is white, which works, because the original Ipods and Macs
were white, so personally, I already have accepted the Kindle to this point,
although Im sure the next generation will have Black! or even Creative Skins!
(OMG!) .Anyways, the kindle itself is thin, under an inch here (take that Mac
Air), and yes, its light. Light enough were you might be nervous to drop it if
it did have a sleek protective cover! Right, the page options of the right and
left work, although I often find myself bumping the page accidently while
looking the thing over, or trying to turn it on/off. Im technologically clumsy,
leave me alone...
The use of the scroll wheel works, and
simply having to push the wheel as the new "enter" bar creates an
easier flow among the item. The actually screen is plain, so if your looking
for color Ipod screen you might want to rethink how important your screen is.
Its boring..yes, but also extremely practical. The screen is suppose to imitate
paper, not a computer. This is to help reduce the strain on your eyes, so if
you enjoy vision, get away from the optically damaging computer and pick up the
new relaxing, vision aiding Kindle. Oh, I just realized that you can't read in the
kindle in complete darkness, so it is more akin to a real b ook than your computer,
what a drag (Kidding). Alright,
home screen--> Its easy to use, its the scroll wheel!, and you can flip
through your items by hitting next page or previous page. Selecting works is
easy, and finding the table of contents or chapters within those books is
simple. I enjoy using the smaller
screen to read, simply because it makes me feel like a speed reader, and in
this age of quickness and ADD, who doesn't want to hit the "next
page" button every 10-30 seconds. Marking your page (aka Dog Ear...classic
idea) is a practical way to save your page, although the kindle remembers where
you left off regardless. You can also highlight lines, add notes, or look up
those "oh too confusing" words you've always skipped over. Im surprised the Kindle has pictures, although
I wish they were in color (no big deal), but I suppose that option was needed
so you can read over the comics in Pittsburgh Post Gazette, which you receive
daily from your subscription via the Kindle! You can also subscribe to blogs
and so forth.
Sadly I did not look into the Kindle Store, although I imagine it would
be easy enough. I mean the purpose is to buy, so the store should allow one to
navigate with ease. You can also throw Word Doc's onto there, which would help
for those who want to review or read papers while actually riding the bus to
class. Ya, pretty limited here since I didn't connect it to the internet, sorry
reader (s), you'll have to fund raise and send me one before I start
buying.
Would
I buy this product? For 400 bucks... not yet. Perhaps if amazon teamed up with
half-priced books (haven't they already?) or something like that and had all my
school books located on their site; then I would buy one. The device is
practical, especially for those who take public transportation or ride in
planes every other day.
Although those would be the two most practical users, I found myself
oddly comfortable reading from the Kindle, and without much time found it just
as relaxing to hit "next" as oppose to flipping those technologically
odd dated "paper text". If I received one from a family member or
extremely generous friend, then I would of course use it almost daily. It
really is practical, but Im still cheap, so unless you notch down the price I
aint budgin. A friend of mine, who has expressed contempt for reading, was sincerely interested in the
Kindle, and was impressed by the overall format and style of the product. He
even went as far as to say he might actually read if he had one, but lets not
get carried away. The point is the Kindle sparks interest among readers and
non-readers alike. Just think, a world where technological not only brings
books together, but people... (I know I know, corny, but only slightly sarcastic). Heres my review, now go buy me a
Kindle!
- Can a blogger be a journalist? Is this particular blogger a journalist? Who decides? I guess a blogger could be a journalist if all his sources a verified, although most bloggers write opinionated entries. Oh, I suppose a article or entry that has been verified as fact is simply an article. So no, a blogger cannot be a journalist. This blogger isnt not a journalist because he does not present any sources, references. I understand to the importance to keep the material anonymous, but in doing so it cannot be presented as factual.
- Is it journalism if it relies wholly on archival material? Not if no one edits the entry, or browses for incorrect material.
- Is it reliable journalism if it depends on anonymous sources (in this case, the unnamed source who provided the author with the Infocom archives)? Again, I would would say not, because the source is unidentified.
- Is it journalism there is no editorial oversight -- nobody to say "Woah, there, are you sure you should be publishing the full text of e-mails that were sent from one private individual to another?" No, you need to check your information and sources
- Was the information pressing enough, or of sufficient news value, to justify a "publish first and ask questions later" attitude? No, i dont think so. While this is seems to be an extremely important matter, I dont that by withholding the information a few more months to cross check his sources would have hurt.
- Is it journalism if the author offers to de-publish text that the original authors don't want published? I suppose if the information is edited by the original material, ya that works
- What opportunity for insight and subtlety was lost when the author chose to publish without checking with the sources? They could be huge caps and incorrect material, and with a subject matter that seems to be taken so serious, it was a bit foolish to jump the gun on this entry
Recent Comments
Kayla Sawyer on Doc. The end: I thought their only fear was
Rachel Prichard on Doctorow: THe BEGINNING : an emotional way of looking at
Daniella Choynowski on Doctorow: THe BEGINNING : I feel your pain David. I was
Jeremy Barrick on Doctorow: THe BEGINNING : Such as cyber culture, it is e
Gretchen on Doctorow: THe BEGINNING : Hello, I like this book a lot.
ChrisU on Hitchhiker : Baio calls himself an "indepen
ChrisU on Kirschenbaum: END: Digital culture made text some
Daniella Choynowski on Kirschenbaum: END: They are just a more involved
Daniella Choynowski on Hitchhiker : Verifiyng is key. Maybe there