21 Nov 2005
Paper 2 Revision
Rescheduled from last week.
Update, 17 Nov: In order to evaluate your revision properly, I am asking to see:
1) your rough drafts (including the comments I made on your papers),
2) a highlighted copy of your new draft.
3) a submission note (explaining your changes and reflecting on your accomplishments)
By "highlighted copy" I mean a fresh printout of your latest draft, with all the changes highlighted -- one color for edits and minor changes (spelling, punctuation, grammar), another color for major changes (introducing a new source, reorganizing a paragraph, etc).
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3767
But..we already revised..I'm confused..
Posted by: Lou Gagliardi at November 13, 2005 07:20 PMYou revised on the basis of peer editing, You didn't get the chance to respond to my feedback yet.
Posted by: Dennis G. Jerz at November 14, 2005 07:02 AMWas that the litery critisicm. The one with the three sources, EX.2-2?
Posted by: Dee Pruett at November 14, 2005 01:11 PMDee, this paper is another revision of Paper 2, the paper that was due today.
I plan to review it and give you feedback ASAP. I'm actually planning to extend the due date slightly, so you won't have to worry about having the full revision complete for Wednesday's class, but you should still block out time to work on it this week.
Posted by: Dennis G. Jerz at November 14, 2005 03:09 PMwhat time monday is this due?
Posted by: michelle koss at November 19, 2005 10:30 PMI'll be leaving campus shortly before 6pm, so anytime before then.
Posted by: Dennis G. Jerz at November 19, 2005 10:37 PM
