The second article I chose to read, was about a woman who was killed after she ran a red light, and was hit by a truck. One thing I noticed was that both articles began the same way. They both included a very brief description of the victims, only stating gender, as well as a brief summary of what happened. Also a source was stated at the end of the first sentence.
"A 3-year-old boy who was
riding a bicycle without a helmet suffered minor injuries when he was
struck by a white GMC Suburban in East San Jose, according to
California Highway Patrol spokesman Todd Thibodeau."
"A Galveston woman died today after she failed to stop for a red light
and her car was broadsided by a heavy truck, police Lt. Joe Pena said."
It makes sense to have someone "official" state what happens because it lends credence to the story.
Second Article assignment page
Comments (2)
I agree with what you said about the articles being very brief. They didn't tell enough crucial information, they only gave an overview of the situation. It leaves you wondering what else happened and wanting more in depth informaiton.
Posted by Carrie Kraszewski | September 18, 2007 9:39 PM
Posted on September 18, 2007 21:39
I liked how you used the comparison of the quotes to strengthen your topic. I agree with you that having an official make a statement, vs. a witness adds credence to the article. Good point :]
Posted by Stephanie Wytovich | September 18, 2007 10:47 PM
Posted on September 18, 2007 22:47