Bridge-to-be

| | Comments (0)
An engagement announcement I saw in the Tribune-Review recently:


newspaper.jpg

This is a good example of why reporters should revise more closely.  Best Practices for Newspaper Journalists states that the Chicago Tribune's "guideline's memo reminds staff members of Tribune accuracy rules such as those requiring that reporters...[read] word-for-word everything in the section for which they work" (Haiman 11).  Reading word-for-word would be a great way to catch obvious mistakes like this one. 

The "bridge-to-be" mistake is not simply the common typo of an extra letter in a word.  The extra letter in the word adds new meaning to what is written.  I don't think a bride-to-be would be happy with being called a "bridge-to-be." 

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

 

November 2010

Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
  1 [2] 3 [4] 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Categories

{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\cocoartf1038\cocoasubrtf320 {\fonttbl\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Monaco;} {\colortbl;\red255\green255\blue255;} \margl1440\margr1440\vieww9000\viewh8400\viewkind0 \deftab720 \pard\pardeftab720\ql\qnatural \f0\fs24 \cf0
\

Twitter Updates

\
    \ Follow me on \ Twitter\
    \ \ }

    Recent Comments

    Powered by Movable Type Pro
    {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\cocoartf1038\cocoasubrtf320 {\fonttbl\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Monaco;} {\colortbl;\red255\green255\blue255;} \margl1440\margr1440\vieww9000\viewh8400\viewkind0 \deftab720 \pard\pardeftab720\ql\qnatural \f0\fs24 \cf0
    \

    Twitter Updates

    \
      \ Follow me on \ Twitter\
      \ \ }