« Brookfield (1-22) Book Agenda Item... | Main | Ex 1: Of Books and Me... »

Brookfield (1-22) Book Informal Reflection...

What is writing?

Though this book was strictly a picture book with captions I found it rather enjoyable and informative for the most part. As we touched upon in the Plato reading people kept information in their heads before writing was highly popularized. We can't remember everything in our heads so it was a natural progression from oral to written culture. Pictograms, the earliest forms of writing really intrigued me the most when reading this text. The idea that writing began as a pictorially based practice blows my mind at times.

Early writing was made up of pictures of people, animals, symbols and objects. I also always found Hieroglyphics to be very interesting. I could not believe that the Egyptians were actually the first people to come up with the idea of toe tags (pg 12). That is really cool as well! Kudos to Egypt! I gather from the text that the development of writing and ways to write had a lot to do with resources that were available in different parts of the world.

It was neat to learn that at the end of Egyptian civilization the Greeks ruled Egypt and all the scribes had to master writing in a new way by using the Greek alphabet rather than hieroglyphics. This lead me to think about the changes in other early societies and the development of new communication form based upon conquest. Once any language was developed it was then a matter of having a constant supply of materials in any given area to record the information.

Kayla Sawyer's agenda item for this section of the text was something worth commenting on. On her blog she mentioned Greeks writing in a spiral and I noted that perhaps they were trying out new methods of writing in order to utilize all of the paper that they had. The book mentioned a constant supply and demand surge for writing materials once writing caught on.

Daniella Choynowski blogged an agenda item that I believe really went well with her personality. She wrote that "music is a language in its own right" which I thought was a really cool part of the text. Music being described as a language is a brave statement to make. To many people it is just a bunch of symbols on a page, but to a musician it is a language that they know and understand. I think again of Chinese being foreign to me as music would be as well.

In response to his agenda item, I asked Chris Ulicne the question: do you think with the growth of technology that some day the manuscript will be phased out completely?

Comments (1)


"I gather from the text that the development of writing and ways to write had a lot to do with resources that were available in different parts of the world."

Great observation, Leslie. It's easy to forget that writing required practical components beyond symbols, figures, and letters, and they too had an impact on the development of language in the different regions of the world.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 28, 2008 7:48 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Brookfield (1-22) Book Agenda Item....

The next post in this blog is Ex 1: Of Books and Me....

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.