The article for the Chicago Tribune gave more information about the topic at hand. The Daily Egyptian talked about one specific person. I mean I could understand if the article was about one person and his dog, but it was about one person and a hoax that he fell for.
I personally think the first article covers more of the story. The Chicago Tribune's story is more about the Daily Egyptian and goes onto explain who, what where and why the story took place then the actual Daily Egyptain did. I was more impressed by their style and voice than I was with the Daily Egyptian's voice and style. I can, however, also understand why the Daily Egpytian only focused on their former editor, it was a news story that they had the most pertient and updated information to.
Posted by lougagliardi at September 26, 2005 08:08 AM | TrackBack