April 2009 Archives
HENRI: Oh, of course. But are we sure it would be any better?" (56)
I don't know what I was really expecting this play to be about, but once I caught onto what the focus of the play was, I was shocked. Felix and Henri began discussing the crucifixion, and it seemed that Felix's big argument for the crucifixion was that it would bring money to the country. I understand that this is supposed to be a very poor third world country, but it is still crazy to think someone would let a crucifixion be filmed just to get money. Realistically though, there are some people in the world like that. That's why I really liked this quote. The things that humans do to one another is horrible. It's hard for me to understand how it doesn't bother people to hurt others. Still, as Henri points out, do we really know that another race would be better? We don't really know if we're alone in this universe, but if we aren't, while it's a possibility that we're the most inhumane race, isn't it equally possible that we're the most humane race? Sometimes things seem bad, but we have to remember it could always be worse.
Read other students' thoughts
"Tall
buildings? Male sexuality. Rolling landscapes? Female sexuality.
Stairs? Sexual Intercourse. Falling down stairs? Oh my." (135-136)
I
think this chapter It's All About Sex... was actually very
interesting. Face it; we're in college. Sex is all around us. How
often do you hear a "that's what she said" joke? I'm used to
people making sexual innuendos, and I usually pick up on them.
However, when Foster was talking about some of the symbols used for
sex and sexuality in this chapter, I was completely surprised. For
instance, his rocking horse example- in the context of this chapter I
had some idea where he was going with it, but if I just read that on
my own I never would have thought that way. I find that when I'm
watching movies and there's that curtain blowing in the breeze scene
I wonder- well did they? I don't think I've ever really had that
thought with waves crashing on a beach though. Relating to Foster's
next chapter though, I think that these subtle images of sex are more
effective than trying to write out some sexual scene. I've found
that when reading, trying to put words to it just takes away from the
scene somehow. Instead, when it's just lightly implied, the scene
doesn't take away from the story at all. Also, I like how Foster
mentioned that putting sex in more subtle terms protects the
innocent. Have you ever watched a Disney movie or some other kids
movie when you were younger and then watched it now years later? I
know I have, and there's definitely some things I didn't pick up on
when I was younger. Now though I notice them, and I'm almost amazed
they're in a kids movie. These sexual implications are depicted in
such a way though that children don't notice, but mom and dad maybe
aren't as bored with the movie.
"We
have pizza and Cokes and fruit salad for dinner, and Mrs. Heppworth
made a big cake shaped like a unicorn's head with Happy
Birthday Mary Christina! in red
icing and we sing and Mary Christina blows out all twelve candles in
one blow." (60)
I
think one of the things I noticed most about this book is the writing
style. As Niffenegger switches between the narrators of Clare and
Henry, she must also change the style in which they speak. This is
further complicated by the fact that the characters are constantly
changing age. As we age, we tend to speak differently. I think one
of the perfect examples of this is comparing the 20 year old Clare
from the beginning of the book to the 11 year old Clare at Mary
Christina's birthday party. The way that Niffenegger portrays
Clare's thoughts and writing pattern at each age really gives you the
feel that she is these different ages. For instance, in the birthday
scene, there are run on sentences, and the entire entry is just one
big, long paragraph. Everything, including the descriptions, sounds
like a child. When Clare is 20, her descriptions and writing have
definitely changed and portray an educated young woman.
Recent Comments
Georgia Speer on Keeping in Mind the Big Picture: Marie, after reading you blog
Dennis G. Jerz on Portfolio 1: Reflecting and Taking a Closer Look: Good work, Marie, both on your
Jennifer Prex on First Signs of Humanity: It is possible. I had never th
Nikita McClellan on First Signs of Humanity: You bring up quite an interest
Jessica Bitar on Symbolism Becomes Personal: I also liked this quote. I ag
Rebecca Marrie on Young Woman Gets Biblical: I think that this quote, as we
Jessica Bitar on One Story to Rule Them All (Foster): I agree with you that there is
Rachael Sarver on Daisy = Paris? (Gatsby): Really good point! Your analo
Dennis G. Jerz on Daisy = Paris? (Gatsby): That's an interesting observat