Compare.....wikipedia
The difference between Seton Hill and Saint Vincent's wikipedia history is that Seton Hills has more. Which means that Seton Hill keeps its wikipedia stuff up to date, or at least more than Saint Vincents does. They both have a good amount of information, but I found Seton Hills to be more effective becuase when you click on it the home page or main page has a picture of the school that you can see right there, the main page for Saint Vincents, you have to scroll down to see the picture and its off to the right so, I dont know I just found that a little less interesting. But then again, maybe Im being bias. Who knows!
Now the discussion section on the other hand, Saint Vincents page out did Seton Hills. Seton Hills doesnt have any pictures or like anything to make you want to read that page, or interest you in the slightest. But Saint Vincents has a picture three pictures and explains where they came from or what they do. It has a better way of keeping the reader interested.
I think that Seton Hill's page has more now since someone from our class incorporated more information about our college. Before, it looked like SVC had more, but now SHU does.
hahahaha O! Ok thanks! Im dumb. And biased. lol